Social Networking: Cross the Digital Divide to
Understand Your Students
BY DIANNA K. RANGEL AND IAN BIRKY
As nearly any college or university administrator will affirm, the world of social networking in cyberspace affects
students in critical and relatively constant ways. Nearly 90 percent of college students log on to the Internet daily
and spend an average of 19 hours per week online. More than 85 percent of all college students have a profile on
either MySpace or Facebook, and the majority of them check their sites at least once each day.
With this level of contact, it should come as no surprise
that these electronic social interactions can have a direct
impact on students’ moods, social confidence, academic and
personal productivity, and overall sense of self. If senior
student affairs officers (SSAOs) intend to connect with
students to best meet their needs, it is imperative to understand their world in this context and to recognize the resulting
psychological effects.
Building Online Relationships
Two of the most significant developmental tasks faced by
college students are establishing and maintaining relationships. The process of finding friends and romantic partners
causes some of the greatest angst and the greatest joy during
the young adult years. Cyberspace is an arena ripe with opportunity for relational ups and downs.
Students who build online friendships can make choices
about aspects of themselves to display or hide. If they display
the wrong aspects, the ridicule can be socially humiliating,
such as being “defriended” or publicly scorned on someone’s
“wall.” Acting irrespon-
sibly, they may unwisely
post images of them-
selves in compromising
positions for all to see,
including professors,
potential employers, or
parents. Even if they
display the “right” aspects
of themselves, students
must struggle with differ-
ences between the online
persona and the real-life
self, both their own and
those of others. Expectations of intelligence, attractiveness,
sociability, humor, and other characteristics can face harsh
reality checks in the transition from cyberspace to face-to-
face relationships.
Beyond what students do online, how they do it provides
important glimpses into their psychological and social characteristics. Online communications are known to be “
hyperpersonal,” with looser boundaries and heightened immediacy of
self-disclosure. As a result, college students often make themselves vulnerable more quickly in Internet communications,
which creates an environment ripe for betrayal, gossip,
rumors, and even cyberbullying. Students may also have difficulty negotiating real-life boundaries around their personal
information—a challenge many administrators are lamenting
as they hear detailed, and often inappropriate, stories about
their students’ lives.
Many wonder whether students in today’s social
networking-infused generation will lose their ability to
communicate effectively in face-to-face interactions. Basic
rules of social exchange, such as verbal and non-verbal cue
attending, turn-taking, and emotion-matching are not as relevant in electronic communications. In addition, students may
have greater difficulty responding maturely to interpersonal
conflict, as online relationships require less socially-appro-priate regulation of emotions and reactions. Instead of
resolving a roommate disagreement through meaningful cooperation, a student may end a conflicted online relationship
with a simple click.
Yet we also know that students’ online social networks
provide a plethora of positive supports during vital developmental junctures. Most students believe that Internet usage
brings them closer to people. Especially for marginalized
groups, such as first-generation college students, those with
disabilities, and students questioning their sexual orientation,
the Internet can provide a safe place to explore feelings and
receive peer validation. Students with significant social
anxiety, and those with autism-spectrum disorders, including
the growing population of students on college campuses with
Asperger’s spectrum disorders, may use social networking sites
to practice interpersonal skills and build confidence in transferring those skills to real-life encounters.
continued on page 33
Go to http://istockphoto.com/