Developing Interc
A Model to Improve Intergroup
Communication on Campus
These days, all student affairs officers are charged with handling issues
of group identity and intergroup relations on campus. Part of the
controversial history of how this task is accomplished is captured in
the changing language of the charge. From the initial demand for
“racial equity,” the scope expanded to include groups defined by criteria other than race—
ethnic or religious heritage, gender, sexual orientation, physical ability, etc. The issue became
“diversity.” Since the meaning of this term was usually unclear, various attempts were made to
clarify it, such as “valuing diversity,” or “managing diversity,” or “including diversity.”
Cover
IFC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
IBC
BC
Zoom level
fit page
fit width
A
A
fullscreen
one page
two pages
share
print
SlideShow
fullscreen
Open Article
article text for page
< previous story
|
next story >
add comment
|
read comments
Share this page with a friend
Save to “My Stuff”
Subscribe to this magazine
Search
Help
